![movie when the bough breaks nudity movie when the bough breaks nudity](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gnCgZfrU8Pg/TZojc1PmebI/AAAAAAAANIE/sqTX7Q8huXw/s1600/Blue+naked.png)
My wife informs me that there are actually two other Lifetime movies about surrogate crazy women who are picked by a Happy-Married-Couple(TM), and this does NOT include last year's quasi-satire of these movies as well as Lifetime in general, Will Ferrell & Kristin Wigg's A Deadly Adoption. The only decent thing I can say about the whole thing is that Morris Chestnut is trying, but that doesn't mean much when he is given such a script that is an insult to boilers and plates. It's amazing how with such low expectations When the Bough Breaks manages to surprise with how dull and bloodless most of it is (not to mention being a weak PG-13 when it could just go all out for adults with an R), and then when it needs to bring the insanity it completely drops the ball, miserably. Sure, while everyone else in the critical world seems to be off at TIFF, I'll just stay behind here and watch the swill that gets put in the trough. Concluding, not terrible but also not good. Jaz Sinclair seemed out of her element and doesn't have the chops to carry the lead role and the film, while Theo Rossi is awful, no engagement whatsoever. The dialogue is cheesy and very difficult to take seriously, also not flowing naturally. As said by others while the second half does pick up things start getting silly, rushed and implausible, some of it making one feel stupid, culminating in an ending that ends too suddenly and almost unfinished-like. Promising beginning aside, the first half is on the dull side. It gets melodramatic in places and should have been much bolder, for a film with this concept it was rather tame. The direction does well with the visuals but in terms of the storytelling it fails, being pedestrian in a lot of the first half and then losing control in the second. The characters fail to be interesting and don't have much to make one endear to them, it was purposeful for some but don't think that was intent for all of them to be so. 'When the Bough Breaks' generally lacks tension, danger and suspense, hurt by that it treads familiar ground so often that any surprises or anything new cannot be seen. Sadly, that slow-burning suspense was far from sustained all the way through. First impressions were a promising start that did intrigue and had some slow-burning suspense.
![movie when the bough breaks nudity movie when the bough breaks nudity](https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w300_and_h450_bestv2/eReY9KBXXFpcEyTg7M882AE9qiZ.jpg)
The production values are not too cheap and the music is ominous without being too intrusive or obvious. Definitely the best thing about the film. Williams and Morris Chestnut is better than average, Chestnut actually being quite good and suitably intensely brooding. 'When the Bough Breaks' does have good elements. It was a real shame it wasn't that, but it could have been so much worse. Far from the truth, actually thought it had potential to be an unexceptional but not too bad film. As indicated just now, there was no initial bias against it or wanting to dislike it at all. The decent potential shown initially is sadly not sustained and generally not lived up to, so sadly 'When the Bough Breaks' is not a particularly good film either. It as a film is still not that much of a disaster too, there are merits here. 'When the Bough Breaks' was definitely not a film that sounded like it was going to be a disaster hearing about it. The cover gave the sense it would be fairly suspenseful and interesting. The premise for the story intrigued and sounded quite good, regardless of its lack of originality.